Phase I SBIR Budget Narrative Guide

Introduction

A Phase I SBIR budget isn’t just a set of numbers—it’s a narrative that communicates how your small business will execute its proposed R&D. The cost breakdown you submit must align tightly with your work plan, clearly showing how each dollar supports the technical objectives you’ve outlined. Reviewers want to see a realistic, justified distribution of resources that reflects thoughtful planning and a deep understanding of what it will take to achieve success during Phase I.

Carefully constructed budgets don’t just avoid red flags—they improve your credibility. Whether you’re a first-time applicant or a seasoned innovator, your budget narrative is a critical piece of your proposal that deserves just as much attention as the technical content.

Cost Categories to Include

SBIR Phase I budgets are built around standard cost categories, each with its own expectations for detail and justification. The goal is to show that your allocations are both necessary and reasonable for the work you’ve proposed.

Direct Labor

This is typically the largest single expense in a Phase I budget. You’ll need to list each team member involved, their role, hourly rate, and the number of hours allocated. Reviewers will assess whether labor aligns with your project tasks—for example, a labor-intensive task should show a proportionally high time commitment. The Principal Investigator (PI) should have a significant role, not just token involvement.

Fringe Benefits

If your company offers employee benefits like healthcare or paid time off, you can include them either by applying a fringe rate to direct labor or by using loaded hourly rates. Whichever method you choose, keep it consistent and clearly explained.

Materials and Supplies

Only include items that are directly used in the R&D effort. Detail unit costs and quantities, and tie each item to a specific task in your work plan. For example: “Composite test panels – 10 units @ $300 = $3,000” makes your need and pricing transparent.

Equipment

Large equipment purchases (e.g., anything that could be considered capital equipment) are rarely approved in Phase I. If you must include equipment, justify it thoroughly and consider leasing if possible. Small items like test kits or general-use laptops can be listed under materials.

Travel

Travel should be minimal and directly related to the project—such as a required site visit for testing. Break down costs by trip, purpose, and attendees. Unnecessary or vague travel entries can hurt your proposal.

Subcontractors & Consultants

If a portion of your work is being done by outside entities, their costs must be detailed and reasonable. Subcontractor expenses should not exceed 1/3 of your total budget. Make sure to explain why external work is needed and attach supporting quotes if possible.

Other Direct Costs

These include any project-specific expenses that don’t fit elsewhere—software licenses, fabrication costs, or testing services. Each item should have a cost basis and justification (e.g., “Cloud analysis: 100 hours @ $2/hour = $200”).

Understanding and Applying Indirect Rates

Indirect costs—also called overhead or G&A—cover the general business expenses that support your project but aren’t tied to a single task. Think office space, utilities, and administrative staff. Including indirect costs in your Phase I budget is expected, and omitting them can signal either an unrealistic budget or a misunderstanding of how R&D businesses operate.

If you already have a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) with a federal agency, use it. Otherwise, estimate your rate based on real expenses. For example, if your annual administrative and facility costs are $60,000 and your total direct labor across all projects is $120,000, a 50% overhead rate is a reasonable estimate.

Be clear about how you apply each rate. A common structure might include:

Overhead applied to direct labor
G&A applied to total direct costs (excluding fee)
Fringe applied to direct labor or included in loaded rates

If you’re new to federal funding and don’t have an established rate, label your estimates as provisional and be ready to explain the rationale. Reviewers and contracting officers won’t expect perfection—but they will expect transparency.

Note:
Having a DCAA-approved rate is not required for Phase I proposals, but be prepared to justify your estimates.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

A well-prepared budget can reinforce your credibility, but even small missteps can raise concerns with reviewers or trigger delays during contract negotiation. Here are some of the most frequent errors to watch for:

Overstating or Understating Costs

Budgets that are padded with questionable items or unrealistically low often signal poor planning. Aim for accuracy, not inflation or minimalism. Underfunding your work plan can hurt you just as much as overspending.

Unbalanced Labor Allocations

If your PI is only listed for 10 hours over six months, it sends the wrong message about project leadership. Similarly, if a junior technician is handling 80% of the hours, reviewers may question the workload distribution. Labor should reflect task complexity and project leadership roles.

Exceeding Budget Caps

Every solicitation specifies a maximum budget for Phase I (often $150,000–$175,000, including fee). Go over this limit—even slightly—and your proposal risks being rejected without review.

Including Unallowable Expenses

Some costs are simply off-limits for federal funding. These include patent filings, marketing materials, bonuses, entertainment, and capital expenditures not directly related to the R&D. Use your fee or private funds for those—not SBIR dollars.

Mismatched Totals Across Documents

Inconsistencies between your Cover Sheet, Budget Justification, and Cost Volume are a red flag. Make sure every total matches—and re-check before submission. It’s a small detail, but one that makes a big difference.

Recommendation:
Always cross-check totals across your proposal volumes to avoid inconsistencies that could delay or disqualify your submission.

Aligning Budget with Your Work Plan

The budget narrative should read like a financial blueprint of your technical proposal. Reviewers look for a clear connection between what you plan to do and how you plan to fund it. When costs align with tasks, your budget tells a compelling story of execution.

Start by mapping major expenses to each task in your work plan. If Task 2 involves extensive prototyping, for example, your materials, labor, and possible subcontracting costs should reflect that. Use budget justifications to explain how specific expenses support individual milestones or deliverables.

Also, ensure that labor hours are allocated in proportion to the intensity of the task. A heavy lift in computational modeling shouldn’t be handled in 20 hours. Conversely, don’t assign 300 hours to a one-week task just to fill time. Balance is key.

Budget narratives that fail to connect cost to scope—vague entries like “general R&D support” or “software tools TBD”—undermine your proposal’s credibility. Your aim should be to make it easy for reviewers to see how every dollar advances the science.

Warning:
Vague or poorly matched budget narratives can harm your proposal’s review. Avoid generic justifications and ensure every cost ties to a task.

Optional Line Items: Fee and TABA

In addition to your core budget, there are two optional line items you may include in a Phase I SBIR proposal: the profit/fee and Technical and Business Assistance (TABA).

Profit/Fee

Small businesses are allowed to include a profit or fee—typically up to 7% of the total project cost (before fee). This amount is added on top of all direct and indirect costs. Including a fee is both common and recommended. It gives you flexibility to cover unexpected overruns or non-reimbursable expenses and does not negatively affect your proposal’s evaluation.

For example, if your total eligible costs are $142,000, a 7% fee would be $9,940—bringing your total request to $151,940 (assuming the solicitation allows this amount).

Technical and Business Assistance (TABA)

TABA is an optional add-on available in some solicitations, especially from the DoD. It allows you to request funding (often up to $6,500) for third-party services that support commercialization, such as market research, IP consulting, or customer discovery.

If allowed, TABA funding is separate from your base Phase I budget and doesn’t count against the budget cap. However, you must specify how much you’re requesting, what service it will pay for, and who will provide it.

Not all agencies offer TABA, so read your solicitation carefully. If included, TABA can provide meaningful early support for your commercialization plan—just make sure the services are eligible and tied directly to the project’s outcomes.

Should I request TABA in Phase I?

Only if your agency allows it and you have a specific commercialization support service in mind. TABA is not mandatory, but it can provide valuable early-stage insights.

Conclusion

A strong Phase I budget is more than a compliance document—it’s an extension of your technical proposal that demonstrates forethought, accountability, and operational readiness. Reviewers should be able to trace a clear line from your proposed work to your resource needs, with no gaps or guesswork.

By understanding cost categories, applying reasonable indirect rates, and avoiding common pitfalls, you not only strengthen your proposal but also set up your project for smoother execution. Be detailed, be transparent, and above all, be consistent.

Use the full budget cap wisely, justify each line item, and treat the narrative as a chance to build trust with your reviewers. A clear, coherent budget tells them you’re ready to deliver.

Was this article helpful?

Yes No